A Questionable Kelly Clarkson

July 3rd, 2006 // 35 Comments
View the Gallery / 5 Photos »

While we love Kelly Clarkson as a singer, her fashion sense leaves much to be desired. The only reasons that I could see her wearing this top would be:

A) It looks good from afar.
B) It’s was really hot in West Palm Beach where she was performing.
C) Kelly Clarkson just doesn’t have a clue when it comes to fashion.

(Source)

By admin
Posted Under: ,
... Clarkson - High quality image size 496x600 of kelly clarkson photo 594
Kelly - Kelly Clarkson Photo (6762687) - Fanpop
... Clarkson - High quality image size 2000x2474 of Kelly Clarkson Photos
Photo: Kevin Hees
Kelly Clarkson’s Super Bowl Performance Truly Idol-Worship-Worthy
photo: Ezra Shaw/ Getty ImagesLast year at the Super Bowl, Christina Aguilera's national anthem performance was a disaster on an international scale. And this year, Xtina's new "The Voice" castmate Kelly Clarkson admitted on Twitter that she was nervous ...
Kelly Clarkson: Super Bowl National Anthem!
Kelly Clarkson does dance-pop on the appropriately titled new demo ... Kelly Clarkson - Kelly Clarkson Photo (121006) - Fanpop Kelly Clarkson – “Already Gone” from the album “All I Ever ... Kelly Clarkson Covers Madonna’s ‘Crazy for ...

Comments (35)

  1. Tru | July 3, 2006 at 5:07 pm

    She’s gaining weight again.

    Reply
  2. Andy | July 3, 2006 at 5:14 pm

    Yeah, she’s gaining weight…

    It’s just abhorrent when a woman actually has healthy curves, looks like a woman rather than an emaciated child, and you don’t have to risk spearing yourself on her ribs when you hold her.

    Me, I’d much rather have someone that looks like half-a-cookie and a glass of water away from marble slab.

    Reply
  3. nomadjf | July 3, 2006 at 5:53 pm

    i just saw this video with Kelly Clarkson in it. I guess that it’s about Dave Stewart’s (from the Eurythmics) first group in the 70s that never released their album back then, and now there’s a big VH1 special on them July 5th @ 6.

    anyone else heard about this?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGvmz32ajao&search=platinum%20weird

    Reply
  4. kristin | July 3, 2006 at 6:30 pm

    RE: It’s just abhorrent when a woman actually has healthy curves, looks like a woman rather than an emaciated child, and you don’t have to risk spearing yourself on her ribs when you hold her.

    She is overweight.

    Reply
  5. goldie | July 3, 2006 at 6:47 pm

    Ugh..

    Reply
  6. Andy | July 3, 2006 at 6:48 pm

    You really think that’s overweight?

    Not a flattering outfit sure, but that’s a healthy-looking weight to me.

    She has a shape at least.

    I despair that the media today has distorted women’s views of their own bodies to the degree that they really think that it’s attractive to the majority of men to be able to count a woman’s ribs.

    I’d much rather hold someone like that close, than skeletal, malnourished stick insects like Paris Hilton and Kate Moss.

    If you think that’s overweight I suggest you look up a small thing called BMI; that’s a better measure of health than some barely-human photoshopped image or emaciated, on-the-gak-diet ‘role model’ from a magazine.

    Reply
  7. las | July 3, 2006 at 6:51 pm

    She is NOT overweight. Those are called hips, which few in Hollywood have, and when they are that size, it means that a normal woman is a healthy weight. It means she eats and doesn’t barf it all up.

    It makes her look infinitely healthier and happier than most starlets like Paris, Nicole or Mischa. (The outfit is awful, though, and actually makes her look heavier than she is. Otherwise, looks good)

    Reply
  8. mpcmike | July 3, 2006 at 7:01 pm

    i don’t care, i still love her!

    Reply
  9. judy | July 3, 2006 at 7:22 pm

    I love Kelly, but I really don’t like the top, its not flattering at all..fire your stylist girl..

    Reply
  10. Sarah-Jean | July 3, 2006 at 8:28 pm

    I’m gonna go for option C. Either that or she needs to FIRE her stylist!!

    Reply
  11. Lipstickgrrll | July 3, 2006 at 10:14 pm

    Either that or she ran out of money after that new haircut.
    ;)

    Reply
  12. girl_24 | July 4, 2006 at 2:29 am

    She is overwiight. That may be “healthy” by american standards where everybody is obese :) But here, in Romania, girls look 100 times better than kelly, they are healthy, they don`t throw up and they are naturally slender. In your face dudes :)

    Reply
  13. blah | July 4, 2006 at 2:32 am

    …and if they moved to America, girl_24, within weeks they would be fat. Guaranteed.

    Reply
  14. girl_24 | July 4, 2006 at 3:04 am

    Probably. That is because american people seem to have forgotten to cook. Of course all the eating out will make you fat before you know it. Here every woman cooks at home and eating out (restaurants, mc`s etc) is for special occasions only.

    I am sorry for my spelling mistakes, but before you get off on me about that try to write in romanian, ok ? :)

    Reply
  15. jim_pro_thin | July 4, 2006 at 3:09 am

    Girl_24 ..whatevar. I don`t care about Romania and how girls are there because i`ll never get to Romania to screw them… but the point is this chick is FAT. Not normal, no way! Fat AND soft. If you want to see a “normal size” girl, check out Jessica Biel .

    Reply
  16. Anthony | July 4, 2006 at 3:20 am

    Andy is either a fat girl or a gay guy fot thinking that this chick is normal sized. Salma Hayek is “normal”, as she has nice curves and btw she is 40. But this young girl is just FAT.

    Reply
  17. delicious_dysfunktion | July 4, 2006 at 3:45 am

    Hey man,why do you gotta put that dude on blast because he defending his stance?If thats the way he likes his girls,so be it.THERE ARE too many bag of bones running Hollywood these days,it is refreshing to see someone healthy-looking like Kelly or Salma.They both look great,thing is Kelly was caught on a bad day when her stylist was pissed,thats all.

    And P.S…you’re a fag.

    Reply
  18. lulu | July 4, 2006 at 6:25 am

    girl_24…who cares about Romania…and I am from Europe, as well. The Romanian people are poor, they cannot afford fattening foods. People in the Baltic states used to be thin, too, but the common phenomena is happening there at the moment: the standard of living improves, people get meat on their bones. The same will happen in Romania later on. No need to get arrogant, dear.

    And people: check out those awful/good plastic surgery sites. Just because Salma has had her boobs done does not make her “normal weight”.

    Reply
  19. Andy | July 4, 2006 at 7:39 am

    Andy is certainly not a fat girl or a gay guy. He’s a hetrosexual male (who is out-of-condition and about 14lbs overweight), who simply appreciates some flesh on a woman’s bones. Nor is he American, where there *is* an obesity problem (he’s from the UK).

    And his point is more that Kelly’s stylist here should be shot; that get-up is doing her no favours.

    I’d agree that Salma Hayek looks good and has nice curves, and that Kelly is possibly at the top end of the BMI scale, but that doesn’t mean she is fat nor unhealthy.

    I’m not saying fat=good, but that there are a disproportionate number of Hollywood ‘starlets’ who are well below their natural and healthy weight, yet still seem to think they are fat.

    And the media perpetuates the myth that skinny=good, and have bred a generation of women who obsess about how many calories they consume instead of learning to like themselves.

    I’d much rather have slightly overweight than scrawny, underfed, and food-obsessed, and I’m sure that many men would agree.

    Reply
  20. Fat Bottomed Girl Who's Not Fat | July 4, 2006 at 10:56 am

    The reason why many of the Hollywood starlets look so bad is because they used to be heavier. When people go on diets, they tend to look bad and scrawny unless they do it in a slow, healthy way that includes exercise. Dieting is stressful on the body and our skin is not supposed to keep expanding and shrinking. It ages us.

    You know who looks good to me? Cindy Crawford. Women who have “maintained” their weight for their entire lives like Cindy look great. The skin is taut and toned. She’s slender and lean, but not bony.

    Some Hollywood gals constantly go up and down. They end up with more body fat in the long run. Get to a normal (not starving), healthy body weight and try, try, try like a devil to stay there.

    I think most men would agree that when they get a woman in the bed and they are tumbling in the sheets, it’s a somewhat vigorous event. They don’t want a weak featherweight. They want a feminine, but sturdy woman who can keep up with them – a little weight in their arms and some flesh to grab onto “feels” better than a sticks-in-a-biscuit waif like Nicole Ritchie and that Olsen chick.

    Reply
  21. Laura | July 4, 2006 at 10:59 am

    Ok yes that top is terrible…but Kelly is not overweight, not a stick either but not overweight. Her body is fine and her hair cut is adorable.

    Reply
  22. Tony | July 4, 2006 at 11:12 am

    Anyone with a double chin is overweight.

    Reply
  23. kristin | July 4, 2006 at 12:34 pm

    If she lost 15 pounds, she might have nice ‘curves.’

    She has several inches of visible fat on her stomach.

    Just because some people in Hollywood are too skinny does not mean this girl is not overweight. That is a logical fallacy; it’s called the “either-or” fallacy.

    Reply
  24. T | July 4, 2006 at 2:47 pm

    So let me guess all you women are a size 2 and all you men have a 6 pack…. You all need to get over yourselfs quickly!!!

    Reply
  25. Sorry, but | July 4, 2006 at 3:04 pm

    Yep, Kelly needs to lose around 15 to 20 pounds. She has a cute figure and she would not look emaciated. She’d be just right.

    Reply
  26. nelson | July 4, 2006 at 4:21 pm

    OMG it’s cos of people like you that us girls end up looking like f*cking sticks!!! Im sorry but, I’m Kelly’s build, maybe a bit flabbier (lol) even though everyone tells me Im not – and I get REALLY down about it and hit the gym starve myself… when I look at Kelly here, she is f*cking AMAZING she is JUST the right size! She is NOT fat!!!!! There is no fat there – you guys are IDIOTS if you think she’s fat… there is NO HOPE for the rest of us… and like I said it’s no wonder we look like sticks… then you say were too thin… GET A LIFE!

    Reply
  27. nelson | July 4, 2006 at 4:22 pm

    OMG it’s cos of people like you that us girls end up looking like f****ng sticks!!! Im sorry but, I’m Kelly’s build, maybe a bit flabbier (lol) even though everyone tells me Im not – and I get REALLY down about it and hit the gym starve myself… when I look at Kelly here, she is f****ng AMAZING she is JUST the right size! She is NOT fat!!!!! There is no fat there – you guys are IDIOTS if you think she’s fat… there is NO HOPE for the rest of us… and like I said it’s no wonder we look like sticks… then you say were too thin… GET A LIFE!

    Reply
  28. kristin | July 4, 2006 at 7:58 pm

    She’s about 15 pounds overweight.

    Reply
  29. althena | July 4, 2006 at 11:44 pm

    first of all if you belly is over your pants you have no business in a top that shows tha belly hanging over your pants! just because you are strech mark free on the tummy soesnt give you the ok to wear a top that shows what shouldnt be seen. remember this ” if i dont want to look at it what makes me think others do” and always check and see if the belly is over the buttone of your pants or what ever it may be that you are wearing

    Reply
  30. Get Real | July 5, 2006 at 1:10 am

    Saying Kelly’s belly is hanging out over her pants is a bit of an exaggeration, don’t you think? If she had a big puffy beer-belly and lumpy cellulite around her middle, then you could say that.

    I wouldn’t call her a fatty. A better word for Kelly is FLESHY. Nothing is wiggling and jiggling or grossly out of proportion. She’s a little overweight. That’s all.

    Reply
  31. las | July 5, 2006 at 2:10 pm

    girl_24, I hate to break it to you, but girls in Romania are not very skinny because it is the species norm — they are skinny because they are POOR. The more wealthy the country is, the more likely people are to have obesity issues — have you seen some of the actresses in the UK? Some of them have some pudge problems.

    Oh, and Americans CAN cook very well, thank you. We do not all go out for fast food every day, so please put that cliche out of your mind.

    Reply
  32. Just me | July 5, 2006 at 10:12 pm

    FAT , FAT , FAT..

    Reply
  33. who, me? | July 7, 2006 at 10:48 pm

    dude, she’s not fat, she just doesn’t have any boobs, so it makes her look unproportional.

    and indeed, that isn’t the most flattering outfit, i would even venture to say it’s a hideous shirt. girl needs a stylist, stat.

    Reply
  34. Brandon | May 27, 2007 at 10:30 am

    She’s not fat. Sure she’s not in her skinniest moment, but I’d be stressed out being an musician. I’d love to be with her. And she’s not really hanging over her pants….

    Reply
  35. seriously | June 26, 2007 at 10:52 pm

    get off your computers and stop obsessing over other peoples weight. thats pathetic..
    get over yourselves

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)