Even Angelina Jolie Has Her Paparazzi Limits

May 9th, 2007 // 94 Comments

Alright, I’d be pissed too. The paparazzi took things a little too far one evening this past weekend.

As Jolie and her family (including boyfriend Brad Pitt, 43, and their four kids) were unwinding in their rented three-story home in the Czech city of Prague (where she is on location shooting the thriller Wanted with Morgan Freeman), a snapper took advantage of a raised shade to snap a photo of the 31-year-old actress bathing her children.

“She was livid,” a security source tells Us. “Angelina felt so sick and so violated, she was shouting and crying and shaking.”

When did photos of celebrities children become such hot commodities. I remember just a few years ago, you never saw photos of celebs kids in the magazines.

(WENN)

By Jessica Marx
atriz americana Angelina Jolie seguida por paparazzi (Divulgação)
Angelina Jolie - Paparazzi - pink_lips
factor ... local paparazzi went into a spin when actors Angelina Jolie ...
last night, Angelina Jolie expressed her concerns about the paparazzi ...
Oscar Nominee Brad Pitt On The Unmentionables: Marriage, Politics and Religion
The new issue of Hollywood Reporter features the double (maybe triple) Oscar threat as he opens up about his career (the brutal fight to save "Moneyball"), fame (and his depression in the '90s), President Obama, and plans to make partner Angelina Jolie his wife.
Angelina Jolie’s toddler inherits mum’s perfect pout
Angelina Jolie probably never considered her pouting crown would be taken by her very own son, but Knox is certainly giving her a run for her money in the lip-smacking department. Trying out some new kissing skills, the-3-year-old twin was spotted puckerin ...

Comments (94)

  1. T-Bone | May 9, 2007 at 2:30 pm

    The good news here is that she was with her kids and caring for them. The bad news is that when you make-out with other people’s significant others on the red carpet, do heroin, make out with your brother on national television, put vials of blood around your neck, have adulterous affairs with extremely famous men, move to Cambodia, and adopt children from all over the world, chances are good that you’re going to attract a WHOLE LOT of media attention and parasitic paparazzi! We reap what we sow.

  2. Ashley | May 9, 2007 at 2:32 pm

    Jesus Christ-I would be furious too. Personally, I don’t want to see a photo of someone giving their kids a bath-that’s a private moment that every parent, including celebrities should be able to enjoy.

  3. Margaret | May 9, 2007 at 2:38 pm

    This is bull shit. This story started in the UK a few days ago (see National Ledger days ago) and was about a photographer who cut a hole in the fence to take a picture of the children playing. OK – that’s bad. He was charged and he did apologize to them, but not before Angie had a screaming hissy fit and threatened to leave the movie even if it cost her a BILLION DOLLARS. OLD NEWS. Now someone, probably Angelina has embellished this and even added a kidnap thread (see US Weekly). Angie. Leave the kids at home OR get some real security OR stop using your kids for publicity’s sake.

  4. Shasta | May 9, 2007 at 2:39 pm

    hmph, public domain, close your curtains.

  5. Swift | May 9, 2007 at 2:58 pm

    I think pics of celebrity kids became hot when Angie started whoring out Maddox about 6 years ago.

    This woman is an ego-maniac who probably tipped off the photographers in the first place.

    We do reap what we sow…unfortunately, it’s those kids that will be paying for that loonies mistakes.

  6. lookwhaticando | May 9, 2007 at 3:20 pm

    How horrible, I would be livid as well, What is wrong with this people. I hope the arrest the pervert and put him under the jail

  7. Bull | May 9, 2007 at 3:27 pm

    Bullllloney.

    Crazy bitch was probably trying to drown Shiloh in the tub and was pissed she got busted.

  8. yikes123 | May 9, 2007 at 3:28 pm

    T-bone, what Angie has done in the past is HER past. Her kids have nothing to do with that. She should be able. like everyone else in this country, to give her kids a bath in her home without sick photographers exploiting her naked kids. That is just sick. Plain and simple. Regardles if some people don’t like her, she is a mother of four, and should be able to do a simple thing as give her kids a bath. Would YOU want your naked bottom blasted all over the world? NO. Nobody deserves that.

  9. anywho | May 9, 2007 at 3:32 pm

    You people are CRAZY. Her kids deserve the privacy of a bath. I can’t believe the lengths these paparrazi go to get pics. LEAVE HER ALONE! Let her give her kids their time and uninterrupted attention.

  10. KARMA | May 9, 2007 at 3:33 pm

    Oh please who believes these PR fabricated stories leaked from Jolie herself.

    They are trying to blame the paparazzi for their upcoming break up!!
    Mind my words.

    This incident never happened. If it did, the guy would have been in jail already. And in order for him to go near their house and bathroom he would have to trespass their property which I am sure is impossible if you saw the photos and the kind of security they have.

    This is another pathetic Jolie outcry for some much needed sympathy.

    The only person who endangers those children is their parents.
    She said she will be a stay at home mom. Where is she now? Where are her children now?

    Go buy a ranch somewhere, live with your kids, and take a movie (Oscar level) once a year.

    WHO SOLD PAX PHOTOS WHILE HE WAS SLEEPING? HIS NEW MOTHER!
    THAT IS MUCH CREEPIER THAN A PHOTOGRAPHER TRYING TO MAKE SOME EXTRA MONEY LOOKING THROUGH THE WINDOWS

  11. Egroft | May 9, 2007 at 3:42 pm

    Yikes

    Spare me the pity party! “She should be able. like everyone else in this country, to give her kids a bath in her home”

    A-she wasn’t in “her home”. she has those kids in a foreign country, in a rented house.

    B-”like everyone else in this country”…please! everyone else in this country isn’t paid a kings ransome per picture.

    C-she has no one to blame but herself. she sells pics of these kids to the highest bidder on a REGULAR basis.

    HER past is indeed her past, but those kids will be the ones to suffer.

  12. superfluous | May 9, 2007 at 3:42 pm

    Kids paying for “loonies mistakes”. Swift, you seem to be the one who is a loon. What mistake has she made by spending time with her kids? She’s crazy for doing things other mothers do daily? Would you want your kids to be shown on the cover of a magazine in the tub? H_ll no! You and others who need not be named are a bunch of bitter you know whats who need to get over your man leaving you. That’s what this is all about…SERIOUSLY

  13. Swift. | May 9, 2007 at 3:44 pm

    superfluous, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

  14. sassyne | May 9, 2007 at 3:46 pm

    She, like other celebrities, “sell” pictures of their kids in the hope tp get people off their backs to not intrude in their everyday lives. I guess it doesn’t matter. Photographers will push their way in regardless. It was wrong. You, Ergfart, etc. can say what you want. No kid deserves that. I hope they catch the sick SOB.

  15. Swift | May 9, 2007 at 3:46 pm

    BTW Supey…when i give my child a bath, i don’t leave the curtains wide – open.

  16. superfluous | May 9, 2007 at 3:47 pm

    Swift, yeah I understand. Antidepressants, I’ve heard, make you drowsy. Get your much needed rest.

  17. Bodhi | May 9, 2007 at 3:47 pm

    why oh why does this one woman enspire such rage? if it was Reece giving Deacon a bath people would be going crazy! Seriously, why do people care about her sooo much?

  18. Egroft | May 9, 2007 at 3:50 pm

    Assynine, whatever gets you through the day.

  19. givemeabreak | May 9, 2007 at 3:52 pm

    Bodhi, people care so much because she is an interesting woman. She gives of herself, her time, money, and home to these kids. She also is a beautiful woman. People can “hate” on her, but these same people break their necks to comment on her as soon as ANYTHING is posted on her. Yet, clain to not give her a thought. Why give her the time of day? She isn’t thinking a thing about any of you. Angelina will still be a millionaire at the end of this day, and you will still be sitting in front of your computers thinking of putdowns for her. In reality you wish you were her. Say what you want you know it’s true.

  20. Egroft | May 9, 2007 at 3:53 pm

    Bodhi, you are trying to compare apples to oranges. Reese is not a home-wrecking, attention-starved nut-case. Angie, is.

  21. anywho | May 9, 2007 at 3:55 pm

    “Swift, antidepressants make you drowsy”

    I’m ROTFLMAO!!!

  22. giveUSabreak | May 9, 2007 at 3:56 pm

    givemeabreak,

    “Angelina will still be a millionaire at the end of this day, you will still be sitting in front of your computers thinking of putdowns for her” and her kids will all end up in the mental ward.

    you, are a joke!

  23. sassyne | May 9, 2007 at 3:58 pm

    Bodhi, these people care so much, the slanderers anyway, because Angelina represents the woman that took their man. They are lonely desperate women picking at an old sore. It’s over. Brad found someone who he wanted to be with. His marriage was dead before Ang came in the picture. Jen HAS moved on. You need to follow her lead.

  24. Here We Go Again. | May 9, 2007 at 4:01 pm

    sassyne/look/gimme/yadda yadda yadda, what ever you are calling yourself today…

    that “they got left by their man” horse is dead. get a new bit.

  25. givemeabreak | May 9, 2007 at 4:01 pm

    Giveusabreak, You are the joke. A pitiful, embarrasing joke. You know what I said is true. Angelina is doing her thing. And Swift, everybody’s mind isn’t in the gitter. I’m sure she didn’t think sick people would go after pictures of her kids in the bath.

  26. givemeabreak | May 9, 2007 at 4:02 pm

    Giveusabreak, You are the joke. A pitiful, embarrasing joke. You know what I said is true. Angelina is doing her thing. And Swift, everybody’s mind isn’t in the gutter. I’m sure she didn’t think sick people would go after pictures of her kids in the bath.

  27. givemeabreak | May 9, 2007 at 4:03 pm

    Giveusabreak, You are the joke. A pitiful, embarrasing joke. You know what I said is true. Angelina is doing her thing. And Swift, everybody’s mind isn’t in the gutter. I’m sure she didn’t think sick people would go after pictures of her kids in the bath.

  28. Bodhi | May 9, 2007 at 4:03 pm

    Seriously, ya’ll let your emotions get WAY out of hand. I don’t think there really is a difference b/w Reece & Aj. Angie does not give a tinker’s damn what people think of her. Continueing to call her a home-wrecker & a whore, etc. is kinda pathetic. Clearly everyone ACCTUALLY involved is over it.

  29. sassyne | May 9, 2007 at 4:05 pm

    Here we go looking like an a$$ again, I’ll get a new bit when you get off the “she stole her man” “loonie” bit

  30. GiveUSabreak | May 9, 2007 at 4:05 pm

    Givemeabreak…got it the first two times sweet-cheecks.

  31. givemeabreak | May 9, 2007 at 4:14 pm

    Giveusabreak, I know it’s difficult to come up with a comeback when someone has said something logical. Are you sure you don’t need it again?

  32. Clarisse | May 9, 2007 at 4:16 pm

    Geeze! The AngieLoonies are ALL uptite today!

    Someone switch your Valium with Imodium today?

    Chill crazies! Chill!

    (as an aside…lil sassywhatever, i read this entire post and the only one to bring up the “stole your man bit”, is you.)

  33. Margaret | May 9, 2007 at 4:17 pm

    Reese is a wonderful, loving and protective mother. It is highly offensive that you compared her to this psycho bi**h, Angelina. Shame on you. Just as a side note – Brad and Angelina are no way prepared for the sheer volume of babyhood they have purchased.

  34. give US a break | May 9, 2007 at 4:19 pm

    givemeabreak

    Comebacks to valid points, i got. Response to redundant bull-sht, i pass.

  35. Linda | May 9, 2007 at 4:21 pm

    Note to Brad and Angie: You cannot turn the press attention off and on. You want a private life stop encouraging the Paps to follow you around and then be outraged when they do. If Jolie was not such an attention whore their lives would be much more private.

  36. Margaret | May 9, 2007 at 4:26 pm

    All you Brangelunatics might want to run on over to Splash and to I’m Not Obsessed, where they have posted the Pitt photo op of the day. This one has Brad, the doting Dad, dragging Z and Shiloh to the park, one under each arm, and announces that his bike has arrived. These pictures are OK, since all the money for them goes to Pitt. No freebies. Enjoy! See why media whores do not get my sympathy?

  37. Just Sayin | May 9, 2007 at 4:30 pm

    Maybe she got some bad stuff from her dealer and just had an “anti-papp” moment, and
    will soon be back to her media whorin ways.

  38. sassyne | May 9, 2007 at 4:33 pm

    Clarrisse, you didn’t have to bring it up today. You’ve done it every other day. This is where all the hate comes from.

  39. Sigh | May 9, 2007 at 4:38 pm

    It seems to me that ALL of you have a problem. You’re sitting here calling Angelina crazy like you know her. Also, the ones who say she’s nice and sweet are crazy too. NONE of you know her. I think to sit here and call her names is worse though. You have to admit, she does do a lot of good. This started off being about the paparrazi filming her kids, and ended up being a mud slinging fest. You are all crazy.

  40. Bodhi | May 9, 2007 at 4:38 pm

    Shame on me? um, no. In no way shape or form to I have to justify my opinions to anyone who spews that kind of hate. As I stated before, get over it. All of the people acctually involved have. And as for media whores… I’d venture to say that 95% of celebrities are “media whores” yet aren’t harshed on for it. Save you hate for things that really matter.

  41. Clarisse | May 9, 2007 at 4:39 pm

    Okay sassy…what ever you say….now…back in the padded room.

  42. Andie | May 9, 2007 at 4:42 pm

    Well said Linda.

    Angelina courts the media and the paparazzi for almost 10 years now and all of a sudden,
    she wants that to stop? As T-Bone pointed out, she is reaping what she has sown.

    She has made a career out of doing anything for the media’s attention now want’s privacy?

    Please. When snowballs grow in hell….or she acts like a responsible adult and mother,
    purchases a stable home for those children and spends more then 2.5 days with them a month.

  43. sassyne | May 9, 2007 at 4:49 pm

    Clarisse, if you get out of my way and get back to your own padded room, I can get in mine.

  44. And? | May 9, 2007 at 4:51 pm

    Sigh,
    Pontificate elsewhere if you are so offended. Buh-BYE!

  45. yikes123 | May 9, 2007 at 4:51 pm

    WOW, that’s all I can say is WOW. Angelina is phenomenal. She gets all of you guys in a knot. GO GIRL!

  46. Clarisse | May 9, 2007 at 4:53 pm

    Wow! Sassy! you’re reverted to “i know you are, but what am i” game. M’Kay, lemme see, OKAY! You’re rubber i’m glue etc…etc…

    Checkmate.

  47. superfluous | May 9, 2007 at 4:58 pm

    Gosh, you people don’t stop. The woman should be able to give her kids a bath in privacy. As far as “turning the media on/off” A couple as high profile as Angelina and Brad cause a media storm wherever they go. THAT’S why they “sell” pictures of their kids in the hope that people will be satisfied. If some of you i.e T-bone Ergfort, Margaret can’t stand them, stop supporting every post the website posts about them. You claim to hate the woman, in reality it’s jealousy, yet you are the first one’s chasing anything about her. You go on different websites in search of info on her. Sounds a little crazy IMO. Look up info on Britney of Paris, they are the ones who need the help.

  48. Dumbss | May 9, 2007 at 4:58 pm

    Yikes,
    Yes, people who are offended by conniving, devious, whores do tend to get aggitated by these stories, while morons with no morals cheer her.

  49. Egroft | May 9, 2007 at 5:00 pm

    superfluous, you forgot…someone stole yo man!

    (just tryin to help a sister out.)

  50. sassyne | May 9, 2007 at 5:01 pm

    Clarisse, girl you are something else…….

1 2

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)