Maggie Gyllenahaal recently posed for the lingerie line, Agent Provocateur, joining such illustrious sirens like Kate Moss, Kylie Minogue and Dita Von Teese, each of whom have posed for the line in the past. The actress was chosen to be the new face of their latest ad campaign based on Maggie’s quirky looks and her general appeal to both sexes.
Serena Rees, co-founder of Agent Provocateur, said: “Maggie is not an obvious sex symbol.”
“She is interesting looking, confident and beautiful in a way that is non-threatening, which makes her appealing to men and women alike.”
Whether or not Maggie’s your particular cup of tea, I have to give her props for having the balls to pose in some sexy underwear for all the world to see after having had a baby nearly a year ago. Lord knows, I don’t have any kids and you still wouldn’t catch me dead allowing myself to be photographed looking all Lady Marmalade and stuff. Unless there’s another Lady Marmalade who likes to be surrounded by walls built of jars of preserves. That, I could handle.
The rest of Maggie Gyllenhaal’s ad campaign for Agent Provocateur is after the jump.































Aqua137 | September 5, 2007 at 11:31 am
She looks hot!
The T-Dude | September 5, 2007 at 11:45 am
I love it. I say no more cookie cutter models, let’s have more of the interesting, sexy, confident women like Maggie.
sasha | September 5, 2007 at 12:08 pm
How about more “cookie cutter models”. MAggie looks good in this picture no qualms about it. But her job is acting she does it better than the average person. SHould they give her jobs to people who cant act. Then why give modeling jobs to non models. MAybe they are not as famous cause they are recycled so much. SOme of them its their livelyhood. Who care if their reality is unrealistics. Im a size 2 but im 5’7 modeling is unlikely to be in my future medschool engineering genetics that is. I would hate for my jobto go to some random person
Craptastic | September 5, 2007 at 12:17 pm
Ummmmm i vote no. She’s a good actress,but as far as looks go….don’t think so buddy.
mike | September 5, 2007 at 12:19 pm
maggie looks amazing in these shots. so much hotter to see some unique features than the same old thing time and time again. i love her!
bebe | September 5, 2007 at 1:38 pm
haha she just looks kinda awkward, esp in the last one….not sexy if you ask me
d-l | September 5, 2007 at 1:52 pm
Ick!
Sase | September 5, 2007 at 1:53 pm
The one where she’s in the bath tub must be her channeling Jack Nicholson with his beige paint on as the Joker.
mutterhals | September 5, 2007 at 2:20 pm
I think she’s gross. Christ, they shoulda put me in these ads, I’m better looking than this pie wagon.
sexyback | September 5, 2007 at 3:30 pm
The last two are weird. Is it her slight smile? I really only like the first two thumbnails. She totally rocks the bored, old-money wife there. The other ones are merely meh.
Sha | September 5, 2007 at 3:33 pm
Some of the pics are cute at best, not sexy. I like Maggie but I do agree that I rather mmodels do the modeling. Sometimes it’s cool to se entertainers doing it but it’s happening too much.
abilene | September 5, 2007 at 3:53 pm
‘Interesting’ is putting it nicely. She’s downright fugly. It doesn’t matter how much makeup and lingerie you put on her, she’s still fugly. And scary looking.
Ruby Jackson | September 5, 2007 at 4:49 pm
Gawd, these are awful. She looks 60 years old. Ick.
Slopcan Mags | September 5, 2007 at 8:22 pm
I think Mags is effing UGLY, no matter how she’s dressed or made up. Why is she famous??
Buy Penis Enlargement Pills Products | September 6, 2007 at 3:40 am
Top Rated Original VigRX(TM) & and the brand new VigRX Plus; BREAKING NEWS!Introducing VigRX PLUS. http://www.male-sexual-styles.com
jack | June 18, 2008 at 9:34 am
wow!!!!!!!!!!!
thats sum gd pics :)0.0
John806 | December 26, 2008 at 5:28 pm
Very nice site!
live cam girls | March 17, 2009 at 9:14 am
live cam girls
John894 | March 22, 2009 at 5:32 am
Very nice site!
John1121 | May 20, 2009 at 11:55 pm
Very nice site!
John1340 | May 28, 2009 at 8:23 pm
Very nice site!
John1340 | June 3, 2009 at 9:55 pm
Very nice site!
John1151 | July 1, 2009 at 3:32 pm
Very nice site!
John1151 | July 2, 2009 at 8:14 am
Very nice site!