Nicole Kidman Dishes On Cruise Marriage To Vogue

June 17th, 2008 // 11 Comments

As you can see, the rumor that Nicole Kidman was going to be posing for a nude Vogue cover was completely bogus. Although, honestly with how tiny her belly is this late in the game, it’s really hard to see the difference and not just cause she’s clothed.

The porcelain-skinned age-challenged actress was met by photographer Annie Leibovitz on the set of Nicole’s upcoming action-adventure epic movie co-starring Hugh Jackman, where the photos were shot for Vogue‘s July 2008 cover, as well as an inside photo shoot.

In her interview with the mag, Nicole talks about her new home in Nashville and her marriage to Tom Cruise, which she claims she doesn’t regret. “Honestly, I would have stayed married for the rest of my life. It’s not like I regret who I was in that marriage; I don’t at all. It was eleven years of my life. It wasn’t 50 years; it turned out to be eleven.”

Oh my God, can you imagine a 50-year-contract being married to Tom Cruise? I wonder how long Katie’s in for … maybe if things go well after the first four, she’ll opt to re-enlist. She’s gotten way too used to those expensive haircuts and Barneys pit stops.

Click any photo to view all the photos in the gallery.


As you can see, the rumor that Nicole Kidman was going to be posing for a nude Vogue cover was completely bogus. Although, honestly with how tiny her belly is this late in the game, it’s really hard to see the difference and not just cause she’s clothed.

The porcelain-skinned age-challenged actress was met by photographer
Annie Leibovitz on the set of Nicole’s upcoming action-adventure epic
movie co-starring Hugh Jackman, where the photos were shot for Vogue‘s July 2008 cover, as well as an inside photo shoot.

In her interview with the mag, Nicole talks about her new home in
Nashville and her marriage to Tom Cruise, which she claims she doesn’t
regret. “Honestly, I would have stayed married for the rest of my life.
It’s not like I regret who I was in that marriage; I don’t at all. It
was eleven years of my life. It wasn’t 50 years; it turned out to be
eleven.”

Oh my God, can you imagine a 50-year-contract being married to Tom
Cruise? I wonder how long Katie’s in for … maybe if things go well
after the first four, she’ll opt to re-enlist. She’s gotten way too
used to those expensive haircuts and Barneys pit stops.

By LT
Vogue December 2000 - Nicole Kidman United
Vogue December 2000 - Nicole Kidman United
Nicole Kidman - VOGUE | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
Nicole Kidman: Style Queen - DIP IT LOW - Nicole Kidman : People.com
Rachel McAdams vs. Nicole Kidman — Fashion Faceoff
Welcome to an international edition of Fashion Faceoff! Both Canadian actress Rachel McAdams ("The Notebook") and Australian-born leading lady Nicole Kidman ("The Hours") tried out the lace trend in the "Mirabella" dress by Collette Dinnigan within just ...
Kim Kardashian vs. Nicole Kidman — Fashion Faceoff
Reality star Kim Kardashian and Oscar winning-actress Nicole Kidman don't seem to have a lot in common ... fell in love with the same lacy red L'Wren Scott dress, causing a true style showdown. It's time to decide just who wore it better.

Comments (11)

  1. DLAEREVE | June 18, 2008 at 6:05 am

    OMG, she is so awesome~~~~I like this picture very much. More pictures of them can be found at forum of Richromances.com. People often look for fun over there

  2. say what? | June 18, 2008 at 6:32 am

    Ya know, I understand photoshopping out things like blemishes and flab, but to alter someone to the point that it doesn’t even look like them…I’ll never understand the point of that.

    she looks great, but they made her look like a different person.

  3. green cardigan | June 18, 2008 at 6:49 am

    say what?

    You took the words out of my mouth! These photos are almost like animation, the horse looks like it was drawn in there. I see no point in photos like this either.
    Wouldn’t real untouched photos of her on a real horse in a real field be far more interesting ? I might buy the magazine then.

    and was there some clause in her marriage contract that said she must continue to promote TC as a normal human being at various intervals throughout the rest of her lofe, once the marriage contract was terminated?

  4. peachpie | June 18, 2008 at 7:14 am

    i, for one, LOVE these photos. they are so dramatic. staged? check. ps’d? check. weird, but beautiful woman? check. really hairy guy? check. unbelievable photography skills? double check. from a photographer’s pov, they’re spectacular.

  5. Applespice | June 18, 2008 at 7:44 am

    I’m agreeing with peachpie on this one. I mean, yes, they’re altered, but they look amazing. Very artistic and creative.

  6. Zekers | June 18, 2008 at 8:00 am

    They do look other-worldly/fairytale-like which I’m sure was Annie’s objective. Yes Peachpie and Applespice (now I’m hungry!), they are supposed to look like that. I like them, she must have a great printmaker working for her.

    Stands to reason that Cruise had Nicole sign a contract that she would never speak ill of their marriage (or him) lest she be beamed-up by his space posse.

  7. leggyblonde | June 18, 2008 at 10:12 am

    Is she having a baby or a tictac?

  8. blueberry | June 18, 2008 at 3:57 pm

    I love the photos. Nicole has always had porcelain, pale skin… Whether it’s genes or botox, well, that’s questionable. But I love the photos. Very dramatic. Very staged. But I think that’s the whole point. I like Nicole. She seems down-to-earth.

    As for the small tummy, some women — especially if it’s their first pregnancy — don’t balloon like elephants. Lucky Nic.

  9. Natalie | June 18, 2008 at 4:19 pm

    they are supposed to look ‘fake’. They are on the set of their new movie. The cover shot of Kidman is of her hanging off a piece of film equiptment!!! Morons

  10. Zekers | June 19, 2008 at 4:42 am

    Well, I was agreeing with your post Natalie, until you had to call names…by doing so you became exactly what you accused others of.

  11. say what? | June 19, 2008 at 6:38 am

    ok, guys, I GET that they’re supposed to look fairy-tale like, and dramatic…but that doesn’t mean they have to alter a person to the point that it doesn’t look like her. you can still have that look to the photos but keep the subject looking like herself.

    they didn’t do it to Hugh Jackman, I notice…

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)