Summary
- Paris Jackson is locked in an escalating legal battle with Michael Jackson’s estate co-executors John Branca and John McClain, accusing them of financial mismanagement, unauthorized bonuses, and self-serving decisions tied to the upcoming biopic Michael.
- The dispute centers on more than $600,000 in questionable payments, a controversial casting decision involving Miles Teller, and a fight over when the estate must release its 2025 financial accounts.
- The estate is firing back hard, pointing to its transformation from $500 million in debt to a multi-billion-dollar empire, and accusing Paris’s team of staging “tabloid press photo ops” rather than engaging in good faith.
Nearly 17 years after Michael Jackson‘s death, the King of Pop’s multibillion-dollar estate remains a battlefield. And standing in the middle of it, paperwork in hand, burgundy blazer on point, is his 27-year-old daughter Paris Jackson — who is quickly becoming the most formidable threat the estate’s executives have ever faced.
This isn’t a passing grievance or a tabloid spat. With all the storms Michael Jackson’s reputation, legacy, and bank accounts have weathered through the years, it could be his outspoken and independent daughter who blows the whole house down.
At the center of the ongoing estate dispute is a combustible mix of money, power, and a whole lot of receipts. At the center of this dispute is more than $600,000 in bonuses, self-described “premium payments,” payouts to various law firms and individuals for largely unaccounted-for work, and an insistence on gifts such as cars and fancy watches that may or may not have come from MJ himself.
Paris, in a pre-hearing brief filed in mid-March, wasn’t exactly subtle about how she feels about co-executor John Branca — the attorney her father fired multiple times while he was still alive. Her legal team described Branca by referencing the film A Few Good Men, writing that he testified “he had neither the time nor the inclination to explain himself to his beneficiaries, and ‘would rather that you just said thank you and went on your way.'”
Colonel Jessup would be proud.
If the financial complaints weren’t enough, there’s also the matter of Michael — the Antoine Fuqua-directed biopic starring Jaafar Jackson (yes, MJ’s nephew) and Colman Domingo, set to hit theaters on April 24, 2026. Paris has long described the film as “sugar-coated” and “dishonest” based on a script she was provided.
Her latest legal filings take direct aim at how Branca handled his role as a producer on the project. Paris questioned the “peculiar and presumably costly” choice to cast A-list actor Miles Teller to play Branca himself, doubting whether such an expensive move would actually translate into higher box office returns.
She also raised alarms about the estate allegedly being forced to spend tens of millions on reshoots — a problem she argues stems from Branca’s inexperience in film production. There’s also the matter of a 1994 deal. Paris and her lawyers want to bury Branca for not knowing about, or knowing the significance of, a $20 million-plus settlement with the family of then-underaged Jordan Chandler that forbade depiction of his relationship with Michael Jackson and the allegations of sexual abuse.
The estate, for its part, is not amused. “The estate is extremely happy with the movie and expects it to be very profitable for the estate,” an estate spokesperson told Deadline.
The lawyers for Branca and the Jackson estate co-executor, John McClain, went full scorched earth in their response. They said Paris and her lawyers have “either not been paying attention over the past several years or simply want to object for objections’ sake.”
They didn’t stop there. They added that Paris and her team “seem far more interested in playing media games by making headline-grabbing, yet false, accusations; raising specific ‘concerns’ over issues previously addressed and resolved, and staging tabloid press photo ops strutting into hearings with obvious props.”
Oof. (For the record, Paris showed up to a March courthouse appearance in a matching burgundy wide-leg trouser set and skyscraper heels, so if that’s a prop, it’s a very chic one.)
The estate’s defenders have a significant counterargument: the numbers. The estate carried $500 million in debt at the time of Michael Jackson’s death in 2009 and was facing the possibility of bankruptcy. Under Branca and McClain’s management, it was rebuilt into a business generating billions in revenue.
They also note that Paris has already received approximately $65 million in benefits from the estate and stands to inherit many hundreds of millions more.
But Paris’s court filings argue something more fundamental is broken. Her filing stressed that the estate has “morphed into a private entertainment investment fund managed more for the benefit of executors and their counsel than its beneficiaries.”
And she’s not doing this alone. Paris, Prince, and Bigi Jackson are legally demanding that the estate release the financial breakdown of their 2025 expenses, with a request for the report by September 15; however, the estate claims they need at least 16 months to finalize the reports.
Retired Judge Mitchell Beckloff — who has presided over this case since Michael Jackson’s death in 2009 — is overseeing the latest hearings. With Paris Jackson and her brothers, Prince and Bigi, now adults, it is hard to deny that the family could take control now.
No ruling is expected immediately, but the trajectory is clear: this dispute isn’t winding down. It’s just getting started. Whether you’re Team Paris or Team Estate, one thing is certain — Michael Jackson’s legacy, financial and otherwise, is still very much up for grabs.
MORE POP CULTURE HEADLINES
