Johnny Depp scores a rare court victory, ACLU must reveal if Amber Heard donated $7M divorce settlement

4 Min Read
Amber Heard and Johnny Depp 2015 Toronto International Film Festival - "Black Mass" Premiere - Arrivals
ย 
Published by
BANG Showbiz English
ย 
ย 

Johnny Depp has won a victory in his ongoing legal battle with ex-wife Amber Heard.

A New York judge has ruled that the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) must provide documentation that confirms whether or not the โ€˜Aquamanโ€™ actress gave the non-profit organisation a donation from the $7 million she received in her divorce settlement from the โ€˜Rum Diaryโ€™ star, as well as the Childrenโ€™s Hospital Los Angeles.

The 58-year-old actorโ€™s attorney Benjamin Chew told USA TODAY: โ€œMr. Depp is most gratified by the Courtโ€™s decision.โ€

Depp had taken action against The Sun newspaper after they branded him a wife-beater who had assaulted then-spouse Heard, but a judge ruled in favour of the British newspaper last November, and his defamation accusation was thrown out.

In March this year, the former โ€˜Pirates of the Caribbean star was denied the chance to appeal his failed libel case.

Depp โ€“ who has repeatedly denied allegations he attacked his ex-wife โ€“ was told by the High Court that he could not pursue an application to appeal, despite his lawyers claiming that they had โ€œfresh evidenceโ€ about the โ€˜Danish Girlโ€™ actress and accused her of lying about donating all of the $7 million to charity.

Court of Appeal judges said the original hearing was โ€œfull and fairโ€ and the trial judge, Justice Andrew Nicol, had given โ€œthorough reasons for his conclusionsโ€.

Announcing the ruling at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, Lord Justice Underhill said: โ€œIt is not easy to persuade this court to overturn the findings of a trial judge on purely factual questions.

โ€œWe do not believe that there is a real prospect of it being prepared to do so in this case.

โ€œThe hearing before Nicol J was full and fair, and he gave thorough reasons for his conclusions which have not been shown even arguably to be vitiated by any error of approach or mistake of lawโ€ฆ

โ€œWe refuse Mr Deppโ€™s application to admit further evidence in support of his proposed appeal and we conclude that the appeal has no real prospect of success and that there is no other compelling reason for it to be heard. We accordingly refuse permission to appeal.โ€

The โ€˜Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Themโ€™ actor โ€“ who was asked to step down from playing Gellert Grindelwald in the wizarding franchise days after the original ruling was made โ€“ is also involved in a separate libel dispute in the US.

That case stems from a 2018 Washington Post opinion piece written by Amber, 35, in which she spoke about domestic abuse, although she didnโ€™t mention the โ€˜Black Massโ€™ actor by name.

A hearing in that matter was due to take place in May but it has now been pushed back to April 2022.